The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010
The line graph compares the difference between three capital cities in terms of international conferences hosted over the course of 30 years, from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is noticable that there was a sharp rose in the number of international conferences hosted by city C, whilst there was a moderate fall in two other city.
At first, city C held no conferences in 1980, whilst the figures of city A and city B were at 35 and 30 respectively. After that, the quantity of conferences held by city C experienced a significant increase to 35 in 2000 before fell moderately by the end of the period. The figures of city A and city B fluctuated in similar trend between 1980 and 2000, with the former dropping to 26 and the latter falling to 24 by 2000.
In 2010, the number of conferences hosted by city A was overtaken by city B, with the figures being 24 and 26 respectively. Even though it went down slightly since 2000 to 31 conferences, the figures of city C was still higher than the other two cities by the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-25 | Lincoln | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | JennieD | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | elteembored | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-02 | thuyduong896 | 78 | view |
- The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010 73
- The graph show the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980-2010 67
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions Where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'city' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cities'.
Suggestion: cities
... there was a moderate fall in two other city. At first, city C held no conference...
^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...city A was overtaken by city B, with the figures being 24 and 26 respectively. Ev...
^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to 31 conferences, the figures of city C was still higher than the other two citi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48421052632 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77992407079 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494736842105 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 17.044958558 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.28571428571 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317023801171 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163833892249 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102779425765 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213363835976 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106850417285 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.