the graph shows anual no of rides taken on two forms of public trasportation in the city of williamsville
The bar chart provides information on the total number of rides taken by bus and by subway in Williamsville during each year from 2011 to 2015.
Overall, the annual ridership by subway showed an increasing trend over the time period, while by bus it was fluctuating.
In 2011, annual bus ridership was a little over 400,000,000 and then it slightly rose to 450,000,000 in 2012. However, in 2013 it dropped a little but later increased to 500,000,000 after which it again reduced to 450,000,000.
Annual subway ridership, on the other hand, rose steadily over the given period, starting from just above 600,000,000, which rose gradually to reach a peak of almost 750,000,000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-18 | Sai sushma | 75 | view |
- The Processes below show how glass containers, such as bottles, are produced and recycled. 56
- the diagram below shows a neighbourhood before and after a mall was constructed 64
- Some people say that government should brake down all the historical building and replace them with modren buildings. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. 61
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 578.0 965.302439024 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 112.0 196.424390244 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16071428571 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2531531234 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86917110977 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651785714286 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 149.4 283.868780488 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.0327785114 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0387058846264 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316108708469 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461935345222 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0395135885586 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485287394584 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.