The graph shows changes of amount and type of fast food consumed by teenagers in Australia from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph illustrates the figures of amount and types of instant food consumed by teenagers in Australia over the period of 25 years.
At the first glance, the consumption of fish and chips dropped gradually from 19745 to 2000 whereas the amount of times that hamburger and pizza were bought and eaten increased.
In 1975, the most popular all-ready food in Australia was fish and chips, which was eaten 100 times per year. This was higher than the consumption of pizza and hamburger which just approximately 5 times a year. However, apart from the brief rise again from 1980 to 1985, the consumption of fish and chips reduced continually over 25 year timescale to finish at just 40 times a year.
In sharp contrast to this, Australian teenagers ate two other types of fast food at higher levels. There was an rapid increase in pizza consumption until it overtook the figure of fish and chips in 1990, at over 60 times a year. Then it remained stable from 1995 to 2000. The biggest rise was seen in the consumption of hamburger, which has sharp growth from 1975 to 1980, exceeded fish and chips in 1985. It finished at the same level that fish and chips began, with 100 times of consumption annually.
- Water is natural resource that should always be free. Governments should ban the sale of bottled water.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The table below gives information on households with a regular use of car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007 Write a report for a lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030. 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph shows the average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone services. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'timescale' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'timescales'.
Suggestion: timescales
... chips reduced continually over 25 year timescale to finish at just 40 times a year. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f fast food at higher levels. There was an rapid increase in pizza consumption unt...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, whereas, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70422535211 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44622114373 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516431924883 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5287889493 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218590294641 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986383889677 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978384734852 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165409790259 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101220216222 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.