The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London,
2000-2010.
The line graph illustrates the yearly incomes of three differences bakeries named Berrie’s Buns, Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery in London over the period of 10 years from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, Both R and B experienced the significant increase in earnings in the researched years. As for L, there was a considerably decrease in the same years.
Regarding the income of L it started at over 80,000 in 2000 after that it started to rise slightly to 90000 in 2001. Despite standing at highest income among 3 bakeries, L experienced a gradual decline during 5 years from 2000 to 2005. Until 2006 its figure was equal to R’s earning, with approximately 60000. L then continued to saw the falling of income to just 40,000 in 2010, which means this bakery fell a half in annual income in 10-year period.
As for B, its income started at just 20,000, which meant that it earned far less than the other bakeries. However, there was a jump to about 50,000 in 2007, exceeding the amount of money that L earned. It then kept going to rise and reached at over 60,000 in 2010. Similarly, over 50000 was an amount of money that R had in 2000. It leveled off with this figure until 2006 before it exceeded L’s. After that, R had experienced a soar and hit a peak at over 100,000, standing at the highest income of 3 bakeries.
- It is neither nor useful for a country to provide free university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 39
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 119, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('considerably') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...e researched years. As for L, there was a considerably decrease in the same years. Regarding the incom...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, so, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63865546218 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64485702746 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5798146556 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.9230769231 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168951566176 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523815993788 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625159646247 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11010417009 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789605436612 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.