The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London, 2000-2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph describes the total earnings per year of three bakeries which were located in London from 2000 to 2010.
Generally, The yearly income in Lovely Loaves stood at the highest place in 2000. There were a sharp rise in Bemie’s buns and Robbie's Bakery income while Lovely Loaves showed an opposite side.
Based on the chart, in 2000, Lovely Loaves held the highest spot with over 80000 pounds and followed by Robbie's Bakery and Bemie’s buns, which respectively at 59000 and 20000. In addition, Robbie's Bakery remained stable this income until 2005 which rose dramatically to over 100000 pounds in 2018. This shop became the store that has the highest income above all. Furthermore, Bemie’s buns witnessed a major change which grew rapidly to over 60000 pounds in 2010. On the other hand, there was a fluctuate of Lovely Loaves's gain about 80000 to nearly 100000 pounds, from 2001 to 2004. However, this number declined significantly to 40000 pounds in 2008 and then enduring this income 2 years later.
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely 73
- Topic Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 78
- crime is a big problem in the world many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion 56
- In many countries nowadays young single people no longer stay with their parents until they are married but leave to study or work somewhere else Do you think this trend has more advantages or disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 493, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...s in 2010. On the other hand, there was a fluctuate of Lovely Loavess gain about 80000 to n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98245614035 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.242977863 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2148279618 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118574579012 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527034876483 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684275075796 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117034923301 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863573275686 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.