The line graph depicts the amount of money earned yearly by three different bakeries in London over the period from 2000 to 2010.
Overall, there was a significant increase in the income of Lovely Loaves and Robbie’s Bakery. Meanwhile, the annual earning of Bernie’s Buns, which started at the highest point, decreased a lot and turned out to be the lowest in 2010.
Lovely Loaves, on the contrary, became the most popular bakery at the end of the period. In the starting year, Bernie’s Buns was the highest line, while RB was the lowest one, and both tended to go up in the next year. However, they fluctuated over the period of five years, especially the BB line.
On the other hand, LL remained stable between 2000 and 2005. In 2005, LL was as favorable as BB but soon surpassed and ended at the highest point in 2010 while BB became the lowest. RB’s earning witnessed a steady growth during the last five years of the period, from 2006 to 2010.
- The given line graph depicts the rate of visitors in Scotland who had a trip to 4 types of attractions between 1980 and 2010 78
- The table below shows information about the population of New Zealand from 2011 to 2012 by age group 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 78
- Healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68421052632 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46726802582 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614035087719 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.3860232362 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121598160527 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544429330189 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708460311236 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973783316371 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843036075336 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.