The line chart illustrates data on the changes in the number of international conferences in various regions, over three decades, starting from 1980.
Generally, it is clear that the number of global conferences which held in city A and B experienced downward trends, whereas the opposite was true for that of city C throughout the observed period.
More specifically, despite starting at roughly 35 and 30 conferences in 1980, the figures for city A and B fluctuated between 1985 and 2000, respectively, before slightly growing to about 27 for each in 2005. Having said that, their figures gradually fell to around 25 conferences by the end of the period.
In contrasts, city C hosted the smallest number of global conferences among three cities, with only 1 conference in 1980, rising significantly to 35 ones in 2000, compared to only 26 for city A and 24 for city B. Additionally, by 2010, the figure for city C had witnessed a slight drop of 4 conferences, at just 31 ones.
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer’s total car sales in different regions from 2006 to 2010. 78
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 73
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...nce in 1980, rising significantly to 35 ones in 2000, compared to only 26 for city A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02165277415 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.0094553137 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195593252455 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964598724109 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406173167775 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119642724896 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302964702468 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.