As countries have developed there has been a trend towards smaller family sizes Why does this happen How does this affect society

Nowadays, people, especially the young generation show a tendency of reducing the number of members in one family. This is because this helps them to concentrate on pursuing their own future careers and reducing the financial burden. This essay will first give some plausible explanations and then discuss several impacts of this situation on the society.

First of all, there is no room for doubt that the youth are making a great effort to chase for a better career, explaining the reason why they generally tend to live with fewer family members. The young generation, especially females, are taking advantage of their in-depth knowledge to search for a well-paid job which helps them to earn a great deal of money for their future plans. Moreover, it is widely assumed that this phenomenon also plays an important role in reducing their personal budget on housing. For example, if they live with one or two members in a family, this can hugely reduce the total amount of money for electricity, water, or the Internet compared to a larger size which consumed much more financial resources.

This tendency towards smaller sizes in families also exerts a beneficial impact on the environment. It is reported from the World Health Organization that a person can dispose of roughly 4.18 pounds of waste per day, which is over 1000 pounds of garbage annually. Therefore, living in a smaller family benefits greatly to the dramatic reduction in the amount of waste emitted each year. Furthermore, there is an argument on its positive effect on the reduction of criminal rate, due to the fact that many poor families with many members have a higher chance to commit offenses to support their living. For instance, Vietnam witnessed 80% of crimes committed by teenagers from larger-size families who are on the poverty line in 2018.

In conclusion, people are holding the intention of living in a small-size family, due to personal reasons such as chasing their careers or reducing financial budget. Additionally, this phenomenon makes great contributions to society by decreasing the number of pollutants yearly and limiting the criminal rate.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69655372983 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575498575499 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4941686546 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171024308914 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666563675761 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622341725113 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107508945436 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318473566523 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.