It is widely argued that a majority of people enhance their senses of imaginations and quickly learn a new language efficiently by favoring reading over watching television. This essay solely disagrees with the above idea. This essay will first give some plausible explanations for this phenomenon and demonstrate specific relevant examples to back up this idea.
There is no room for doubt that watching TV is not only a means of entertainment but also a great source of in-depth knowledge and language skills. Being highly exposed to a language-related environment such as media or TV provides infants with a wide range of sources to gradually enhance their language learning skills from an early age. A study shows that infants start imitating and babbling repetitively as they see an advertisement on TV, and therefore, partially helps them to develop their communication and language skills well in the future.
Moreover, TV also an intriguing source to hugely improve one’s imaginations. The young generation have a high tendency to watch TV on a regular basis to provide them with a sufficient amount of knowledge about the world, which greatly stimulates their curiosity as well as creativity, eventually benefits to their imaginations. Taking Vietnam as a prime example, it is reported that over 78% of primary schoolers spending roughly 4 to 5 hours for watching TV brilliantly perform a higher level of imaginations through their drawings at schools compared to who does not.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that enjoying watching TV plays a crucially important part of the development of one’s imaginations as well as language learning skills.
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata. 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Towns A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- US government expenditure on research 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns as well as language learning skills.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30943396226 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09628562831 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618867924528 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.7572667789 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.7 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.7 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222641942703 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830232634084 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444752553573 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12704396647 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110648277515 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.