It is widely assumed that the government intervention of adopting a higher payment for fuel would probably be a plausible solution to improve the environmental conditions. I personally agree with the above idea. This essay will give a better insight into this implementation and then demonstrate some reasonable examples.
There is no room for doubt that prohibitively expensive fuel will prevent people from commuting by cars and other vehicles, resulting in environmental protection. More specifically, this instant intervention enables to strongly limit the air pollution. This is because a number of harmful gases such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, or nitrogen dioxide greatly put the ecology system into grave danger of ozone destruction which protects human from a high level of radiation in outer space. Research recently has been carried out by Oxford University reveals that the traffic accumulation where tons of vehicles stuck in roads emits a high concentration of those detrimental gases.
This issue consequently also causes great damage to the marine environment in many aspects. First of all, waste substances from fuel exploitation and vehicles will straightly go down to the ocean or river, which leads to the home loss of many aqueous species like whales, sharks, crab, or starfish. Additionally, it takes hundreds of years to effectively decompose those toxic compounds involving a vast majority of hydrocarbons like hexane, octane, methane, or nonane. Moreover, this process which is highly expensive requires cutting-edge technology for installation, and thus, reduces the national budget.
In conclusion, in terms of biodiversity, fuel for cars and some transports negatively impacts on the environment, so the government tends to skyrocket fuel prices in order to limit private vehicles is an optimal solution to improve our habitats.
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are causes And what will be effected on society 89
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 78
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.(Study Sample) 73
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60563380282 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0959415685 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679577464789 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5431434782 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127506358943 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465394170507 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353043753984 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815410702629 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357406313638 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.