The graph shows the number of visitors for three different areas in the European country between 1987 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates how many visitors travel to three categories of attractions, namely the coast, the mountain and the lake, in a European country over the course of 20 years starting in 1987.
Overall, the country witnessed an upward trend in three types of tourists. Throughout the period, the coast was always the most popular tourism.
In 1987, there was about 70.000 persons who visited the coast. This amount of visitors fell gradually to 50.000 by 1997. The figure tended to rise steadily after 1997 to reached 80.000 in 2007.
In 1987, the number of visitors those went to the mountain and the lake were around 20.000 and 30.000 respectively. The figure of visitors to the mountain increased sharply to its peak of 70.000 in 2003 before falling down to 60.000 in 2007. The amount of tourists in the lake rose marginally to 40.000 in 2007. It was, therefore, the least popular of the attraction at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | canconmuoi | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the number of visitors for three different areas in the European country between 1987 to 2007. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to the England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 789.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87037037037 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45403561696 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6318387776 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.3 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196581288403 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711211626426 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609787969656 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120026617511 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593246817369 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.