The graph shows the percentage of 15-year-olds with low literacy (reading and writing) levels in four countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the figure of low literate 15-year-olds from 0 to 30% with intervals of 5% in four different Western nations between 2000 and 2009.
At first glance, it is clear that there was a decline in the percentage of 15-year-olds with low literacy levels in Denmark, while the others experienced the opposite trend. Furthermore, poor literate Austrian teenagers at 15 surpassed other countries and ranked first.
In more detail, in 2000, the proportion of adolescents at 15 with low literacy levels in Denmark was under 20% and registered the highest position among the countries. The rate, however, gradually decreased to 15% by the end of the period.
On the other hand, the other nations increased by varying degrees. Austria witnessed a significant rise from approximately 15% to about 28% during the timescale, reaching the top of the chart. Meanwhile, the percentages of 15-year-olds with literacy problems in Sweden and Denmark started at 11% and 13%, respectively. Afterward, both of them increased to the exact figure, 17%.
- The graph shows the number of students enrolled on different course types in China 78
- The graph shows the percentage of 15 year olds with low literacy reading and writing levels in four countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...assed other countries and ranked first. In more detail, in 2000, the proportion ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24852071006 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98631965944 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633136094675 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.1481806939 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5555555556 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253892845426 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968992118109 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838971376579 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158716926974 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358720786084 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.