The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet.
The line graph compares a fluactuation in the percentage of young people in the UK who choose to eat a vegetarian diet.
In general terms, there has been significant variation in vegetarianism among young people in the UK: one peaking in 1980 and the second to reach a low point approximately twenty years later, in 1996.
In 1960, only a small percentage of adolescent ( about 1%) were vegetarian. There was a dramatic increase over 15% following a vegerarian diet until 1980. Thereafter, the proportion of young people who chose to eat vegetarian diet decreased gradually round 6% in 1990 and then fluctuated for a decade.
On the other hand, it reached a low point of just 4% in 1996. After, it has risen slightly nearly 10% since 2010 and is expected to continue to do so over the next few years. After reaching a high point in around 2015 about 12% and it is projected to fall again and possibly level off by the end of decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- Children should always follow their parents parents advice To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- The flowchart below the recycling process of aluminium cans 66
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who choose certain university subjects in 2005. 73
- It is generally accepted that smoking causes the deaths of large number of people In order to address this problem governments should bans smoking in public places To what extend do you agree or disagree 79
- The pie charts and the table show the types of living accommodation occupied by 25 year olds in London during yhr 1990s and 2010s and the availability of different types of accommodation in London during the same two periods 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0, only a small percentage of adolescent about 1% were vegetarian. There was a dr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58682634731 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72416263602 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5969482475 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177275305233 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770955013782 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897893763398 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107877006098 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109346825287 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.