The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet.
The line graph compares a fluactuation in the percentage of young people in the UK who choose to eat a vegetarian diet.
In general terms, there has been significant variation in vegetarianism among young people in the UK: one peaking in 1980 and the second to reach a low point approximately twenty years later, in 1996.
In 1960, only a small percentage of adolescent ( about 1%) were vegetarian. There was a dramatic increase over 15% following a vegerarian diet until 1980. Thereafter, the proportion of young people who chose to eat vegetarian diet decreased gradually round 6% in 1990 and then fluctuated for a decade.
On the other hand, it reached a low point of just 4% in 1996. After, it has risen slightly nearly 10% since 2010 and is expected to continue to do so over the next few years. After reaching a high point in around 2015 about 12% and it is projected to fall again and possibly level off by the end of decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-03 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your own 56
- The graph below shows waste recycling rates in the U.S. from 1960 to 2011. 56
- The Internet has many disadvantages as it does advantagesTo what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0, only a small percentage of adolescent about 1% were vegetarian. There was a dr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 766.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58682634731 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72416263602 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5969482475 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177275305233 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770955013782 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897893763398 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107877006098 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109346825287 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.