The graph shows the percentages of people going to cinemas in a European country on different days.
The bar chart illustrates the proportions of movie-goers in a European country on different days in three years: 2003, 2005 and 2007.
Overall, while the percentage of people visiting the cinema on Wednesday witnessed a downward trend, the figures for other days saw no significant changes over the years. In addition, people in this country went to the cinema the most on weekends.
In 2003, the percentage of people going to the cinema on Monday was 10%, a third of that on Sunday while Saturday witnessed the highest proportion of movie-goers (40%). While the figures for these three days increased by roughly 5% in 2005, the final year saw a marginal decline of 3% in all three figures. Meanwhile, the figure for Friday remained stable at 30% after four years.
Starting at 15% in 2003, the percentage of cinema-goers on Wednesday constantly decreased to 9% in 2007. There were 20% of people going to the cinema on Tuesday, higher than that on Thursday by 3%, in 2003, after which both figures saw a drop of 2%. In the final year, while the figure for Tuesday increased slightly to 19%, that for Thursday rose considerably by 5%.
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree 80
- Task 2 Some people think that organizing international sports events is good for the host country while others think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82142857143 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64934492465 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525510204082 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1364556246 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269646687109 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114457645062 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778610974361 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176329426406 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514233036864 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.