The graph shows the production of main fuels in UK between 1986 and 2000
The line graph compares the amount of three main fuels were petroleum, coal and natural gas production in uk over a period shown.
Overall, the amount of petroleum and natural gas produced increased, but the figure for coal decreased from 1986 to 2000. In addition, petroleum was by far the most popular mean of production for main fuels in uk in the whole period.
In 1986, the amount of petroleum produced stood at 120, while the figure for coal and natural gas were lower, at about 115 and 60 respectively. The uk saw the amount of petroleum produced climbed to 140 in 1991. On the other hand, the figure for coal fell to 80 and that for natural gas remained unchanged.
The amount of petroleum declined slowly, before recovering to a peak of 142 in 2000. In contract, the figure for coal rose slightly, it was followed by coal fell to 60 at the same time. Interestingly, the amount of natural gas produced still remained unchanged, but this figure underwent was rose rapidly to 120 at the end of period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ile the figure for coal and natural gas were lower, at about 115 and 60 respectively...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, still, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54705712539 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477777777778 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4252717674 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15927210419 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821780001153 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090713482172 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13974461729 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105703438023 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.