The graph shows the production of main fuels in the UK between 1986 and 2000.
The line graph gives information about the amount of petroleuim, coal and natural gas produced in the UK over the 14-year period, starting from 1996.
Overall, it is evident that both the production of petroleum and natural gas increased over the mentioned period, while that of coal experienced an upward trend. In addition, the quantity of produced petroleum was always the highest during the period.
In 1996, 120 million tons of petroleum was made in the UK, which doubled the amount of natural gas. In the same year, the figure for coal was around 110 million tons. By 1991, while the manufacture of petroleum increased to 140 million tons, that of coal witnessed a drop to only 80 million tons. Meanwhile, the quantity of produced natural gas remained stable, at 60 million tons.
From 1991 to 1995, the situation was reverse regarding petroleum and coal. Whereas the quantity of petroleum produced fell back to 120 million tons, there was a slight rise by about 10 million tons in the amount of coal. Simultaneously, natural gas production still leveled off at 60 million tons. By the year 2000, whilst the amount of petroleum manufactured went up until peaking at just over 140 million tons, that of coal to only 60 million tons, which was the lowest figure in 2000. Regarding natural gas, its production saw a dramatic increase of 60 million tons from 1995 to 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below show relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- The map show changes between 1960 and now in the Station street Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hich doubled the amount of natural gas. In the same year, the figure for coal was ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1149.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88936170213 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54312198748 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468085106383 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2564446277 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0688906346788 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326790369157 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356324742206 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0512067012079 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027005802066 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.