Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, travelling overseas has become more popular all over the world. While some people argue that this trend raises conflicts among people of different countries, I am of the opinion that global tourism is the stable bridge that connects cultures.
To commence with, traveling abroad provides tourists with more understanding about a foreign country’s history and geography. Almost all natural destinations and historical remaining have been exploited and equipped with adequate facilities and services. This helps ensure that tourists will have the best experience possible and thus, creating a positive impression about that country. For example, when travelers come to the historical Korean castle, they will have a chance to explore the ancient royal life represented and even try on national costumes through different dynasties. This makes the trip more interesting and attractive to these tourists and therefore, creates inside themselves a deeper insight in that nation.
Moreover, an overseas trip can also help improve a tourist’s knowledge about that country's traditions and customs. When traveling abroad, tourists are likely to be exposed to ingenious people and their lifestyle. As a result, they may discover various interesting differences between cultures and thus, treasuring more these foreign cultures as well as their own one. This also helps enrich their real-life experience and skills for their daily life. For example, foreign travelers may be overwhelmed by the British’s complicated table manners, but understanding all of them helps a lot when having a high standard dinner in a Western-style restaurant.
To conclude, I believe that global traveling can cement the understanding between different cultures because it opens the door for tourists to explore various aspects of a foreign country.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams by subject and gender during the period 2010 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 59
- People say that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 67
- People have different job expectations for jobs Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently What are advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64620938628 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85727699959 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599277978339 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.850571976 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.307692308 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099331310642 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0361013971262 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362121867347 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073881019869 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0299124195247 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.