These days people in some countries are living in a “throwaway” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are its causes and what impacts can it have?
In this age and day, people in many nations have a tendency to utilise things in a short term and then buy new things to replace. This heated phenomenon may emerge from different causes, resulting in several considerable issues in people's life.
There are some reasons leading to this tendency that should be mentioned. The first one is the constant development of people's life. It is undeniable that with the increasing pace of life, technology is also advanced and everything in our daily life keeps becoming outdated day by day. Everyone would like to own the latest products to catch up with the trend of the whole world. For example, in the outbreak of smartphone, people always desire to own an iphone 12 which is considered the most modern version of smartphone. Therefore, some people would willingly cough up a great deal of money to buy it although their recent smartphone is still new and usable. Another reason contributing to this issue is that throwing things away is sometimes convenient and help people feel comfortable. There are something that can be recycled, but people may think that keeping them in their home would be so untidy. Therefore, they opt for removing these things as a way to clean their house.
This phenomenon is undeniably causing a lot of problems to people's life. The first one is the wastefulness. If people keep buying new things to replace their recent one in such a short time, it would cost them a large amount of money which can be used in many other useful activities such as charity. Moreover, this problem can negatively affect the environment. For example, when people remove plastic bottles from their house instead of recycling them, it would be harmful can cause pollution.
To conclude, a "throwaway" society can begin from many reasons and it is causing several problems to people's life. We should join hands to use things better which will certainly help our life a lot.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-12 | Khanhu010101 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 85 | view |
| 2020-04-10 | Cuberates | 80 | view |
- Medical services should be run by profit making companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree 78
- People have different job expectations for jobs Some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently What are advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint 67
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ul can cause pollution. To conclude, a 'throwaway' society can begin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91185410334 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71877999722 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9702719873 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292580601711 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865638219858 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587145417316 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18693580293 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187795791934 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.