The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This graph illustrates the ratio of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a nation.
The rate of recycling of glass containers and aluminum cans showed a significant rise in the table. While the the recycling rate of paper cardboard decreased. And plastics’ recycling rate experienced only a slight increase in the period.
In the year 1982, glass containers and paper recycling rates were at 50% and 65% respectively. Later, in the period of 1990-1994, both experienced a growth of 10% and 15%. .The recycling rate of aluminum cans began showing an upward trend in the year 1986 till it reached 45% in the year 2010. The recycling rate of plastic increased slightly starting from the year 1990 until it reached 10% by the end of the timeframe.. In the meantime, the highest recycling rate was that of paper and cardboard at 70% followed by glass containers at 60%.
- advantages and disadvantages In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper book Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 78
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 714 1000
No. of Different Words: 80 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.667 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.897 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.493 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.678 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4