The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
This graph illustrates the ratio of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a nation.
The rate of recycling of glass containers and aluminum cans showed a significant rise in the table. While the the recycling rate of paper cardboard decreased. And plastics’ recycling rate experienced only a slight increase in the period.
In the year 1982, glass containers and paper recycling rates were at 50% and 65% respectively. Later, in the period of 1990-1994, both experienced a growth of 10% and 15%. .The recycling rate of aluminum cans began showing an upward trend in the year 1986 till it reached 45% in the year 2010. The recycling rate of plastic increased slightly starting from the year 1990 until it reached 10% by the end of the timeframe.. In the meantime, the highest recycling rate was that of paper and cardboard at 70% followed by glass containers at 60%.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 73
- In recent years there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possib 78
- Some people think that enjoying the present is more important than planning for the future for both countries and individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree
- Some people think that robots are important for human s future development Others think that robots have negative effects on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 714 1000
No. of Different Words: 80 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.667 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.125 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.897 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.125 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.493 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.678 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4