The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
From the graph we can see that overall, paper& cardboard rose highly through the three years, glass containers dropped in a year but had a climb, aluminum cans rose significantly through 27 years, and plastics remain unchanged
Paper& cardboard and plastics consumed to be the easiest to recycle although paper& cardboard hit a low in the 1982 but then grow till 1990 and had a decrease again in 2006. Plastics on the other hand remained at roughly the same level until 2010 it went up.
Not the easiest to recycle but made hits glass containers rose dramatically increased from 1986 to 2010 which was at its highest peak, aluminum cans was stable in 1982 but the suddenly fall in 1990 but then went up stable and hit a growth in 2010.
- Despite large numbers of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining is gaining popularity in contemporary world What problems are associated with it What solutions can you suggest 67
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming ever more prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views an 73
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry 84
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What s your opinion 84
- The Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009
This is a wrong sentence in meaning:
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
=======================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 150 200
No. of Characters: 702 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.5 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.68 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.477 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 42 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 27.699 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.52 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4