The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
From the graph we can see that overall, paper& cardboard rose highly through the three years, glass containers dropped in a year but had a climb, aluminum cans rose significantly through 27 years, and plastics remain unchanged
Paper& cardboard and plastics consumed to be the easiest to recycle although paper& cardboard hit a low in the 1982 but then grow till 1990 and had a decrease again in 2006. Plastics on the other hand remained at roughly the same level until 2010 it went up.
Not the easiest to recycle but made hits glass containers rose dramatically increased from 1986 to 2010 which was at its highest peak, aluminum cans was stable in 1982 but the suddenly fall in 1990 but then went up stable and hit a growth in 2010.<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 56
- The maps below the changes that have taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighboring town since 1962 67
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 67
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
This is a wrong sentence in meaning:
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
=======================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 150 200
No. of Characters: 702 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.5 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.68 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.477 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 42 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 27.699 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.52 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4