The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
From the graph we can see that overall, paper& cardboard rose highly through the three years, glass containers dropped in a year but had a climb, aluminum cans rose significantly through 27 years, and plastics remain unchanged
Paper& cardboard and plastics consumed to be the easiest to recycle although paper& cardboard hit a low in the 1982 but then grow till 1990 and had a decrease again in 2006. Plastics on the other hand remained at roughly the same level until 2010 it went up.
Not the easiest to recycle but made hits glass containers rose dramatically increased from 1986 to 2010 which was at its highest peak, aluminum cans was stable in 1982 but the suddenly fall in 1990 but then went up stable and hit a growth in 2010.
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram details the process of making leather products Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from1982 to 2010 70
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 56
This is a wrong sentence in meaning:
The line illustrates the recycling materials of, Paper& cardboard, glass containers, aluminum cans and plastics through 1982 to 2010
=======================
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 4 10
No. of Words: 150 200
No. of Characters: 702 1000
No. of Different Words: 85 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.5 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.68 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.477 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 42 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 14 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 37.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 27.699 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.52 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.52 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.053 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 4