The given graph illustrates the percentage of people, who didn’t have work in two countries: the USA and Japan from March 2005 to March 2011.
Looking at the graph, it is clear that there were two opposite trends, the proportion of unemployment in the USA experienced a downward trend while that of Japan witnessed a gradual increase per year.
On March of 2005, the top of joblessness level belonged to the USA with approximately 7%, on the contrary, the Japanese with no working only accounted the least for just under 2.5%. Over every year, this figure for two locations fluctuated slightly and the consequence was people no working in the USA decreased with average a half percent, keeping this situation over above 5 years following and its nadir at 5 %. Furthermore, at that period time in Japan, the level of unemployment went up more rapidly in 5 years later, which almost double, reaching nearly 5%.
In particular, over 2010 of March, both in two countries showed a level off, the similar of the percentage of joblessness maintained to March 2011 at around 5%.
- The table below gives data on the hour of leisure time per year for people in Someland 84
- Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically. Do you think the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 51
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... maintained to March 2011 at around 5%.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, while, in particular, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89071038251 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78561636875 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628415300546 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.7051389112 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.166666667 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203403918826 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108315848 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762312518524 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14467850111 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0641693053487 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.