The graph shows the value in US dollars (in millions of dollars) of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014.
The given line graph provides a comparison of the number of US dollars invested in funds in terms of company shares, fine art, gold, and property measured in millions of dollars over a 26-year-period.
From an overall perspective, one particularly interesting fact highlighted by the figure is that gold hosted the first rank over the years shown. Three of four categories witnessed the fluctuated trend except for company shares which had an upward trend during 26 years.
According to the data on a diagram, it is evident that gold accounted for 100 million dollars at the beginning of the period while others were under this index. Noticeably, the money invested in company shares and property had the same pattern in the first stage. However, in 1992, the dollars consumed for gold plummeted to exactly 50 million dollars and met the same record as company shares and property. In the same year, the funds for fine art increased to nearly 100 million dollars.
In spite of the fluctuation, the capital used for gold reached its peak in 2012, with a number was around 450 million dollars. Subsequently, the disbursements for fine art and company shares in 2012 cost 300 million dollars and 200 million dollars respectively. While in this year, the spending on the property was merely 200 million dollars which is roughly less than 2 times when compared with the fine art index. However, at the end of the period, the funds for gold decreased by nearly 100 million dollars. Finally, the fine art, company shares, and property witnessed an increment in the number, which was 305 million dollars, 250 million dollars, and 200 million dollars respectively.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Although there are a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced 11
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, so, while, except for, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 965.302439024 143% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9963898917 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6455518019 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490974729242 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 403.2 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0734662028 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.333333333 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266047043456 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109605110023 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749230765621 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177522041471 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790783076641 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.