the graphs below show the changes in age structure of population in a European country from 1901 to 1981 an a projection to 2021
The pie charts illustrate the shares of age structure of population in a European country between 1901 and 1981 and a projection in 2021.
Overall, the total population increased and continue this trend in the future. It is clear that the vast majority of the population ages from 0 to 64. Additionally, while other age groups show upward patterns, 0-64 group demonstrates the opposite.
Initially, the total population was approximately 38 miilions, it grew to 58 million in the next 8 decades and is projected to reach 64 million in 2021. In 1991, The 0-64 group accounted for 95% of the population. However, this figure declined by 12% in 1981 and is speculated to plunge down to 78%.
The population aging 65-84 held the share of only 4% in 1901 but this proportion quadrupled in 1981 and is projected to stay the same in 2021. Noticeably, 1% of the country’s citizens aged over 85. Nonetheless, the percentage is expected to witness a mighty growth by 5% in 2021.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-26 | grahamoneil | 44 | view |
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005. 90
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries, as poor countries need the workers more. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of an international organization rather than each national government. Do you agree or disagree? 86
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 70
- Long distance flight uses more fuel than cars and brings pollution to the environment We should discourage non essential flight rather than limit the use of cars To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, nonetheless, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 817.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8630952381 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97894515375 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60119047619 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0043936469 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.7 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367356566615 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129963870901 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126901494026 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238990076515 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136766761959 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.