The graphs below show the Expenditure on Heath & Education, UAE as percentage of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy.
The graphs elucidate the percentage of GDP spend on health and education in UAE from 1985 to 1993 also shows the infant mortality and life expectancy of this country from 1970 to 1992.
As it is observed from the first graph, UAE spent 10% on education and about 8% on education of their GDP. After 5 years, the GDP support on health decreased to about 7% whereas the GDP support on education increased by 4%. Finally in 1993, the percentages on both sectors increased; 10% for health and around 15% for education. This indicated that UAE government decided to spend more of GDP on both sectors but little bit more money provided to education than health.
In the second graph, the life expectancy in UAE was 60 years in 1970, while infant mortality was 70 per thousand. After 22 years, both of these improved. The age for the life expectancy rose by 10 years whereas 20 per thousand were recorded for the infant mortality rate.
It is apparent that, GDP expenditure on sectors increased over the period as a result, the life expectancy increased and infant mortality decreased.
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 80
- The graph below shows US consumers average annual expenditures on cell phone and residential phone services between 2001 and 2010 67
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 81
- The cost of international travel is decreasing and tourism is increasing in many countries. What are the advantages and disadvantages of the rising trend of tourism for countries?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 60
- The bar graph compares the amount of coffee and meat consumed each year by Norway, France, Germany, USA, Russia, China and Japan. 70
UAE spent 10% on education and about 8% on education of their GDP
UAE spent 10% on education and about 8% on health of their GDP
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 188 200
No. of Characters: 864 1000
No. of Different Words: 93 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.703 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.596 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.542 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.889 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.402 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.889 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.442 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.7 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4