The bar graph illustrates the spending of UAE budget on Health and Education by percentages of GDP between 1985 and 1993. The line graph shows the comparison of life expectancy and child mortality in 1970 and 1992.
Overall, it is clear, that infant mortality reduced sharply over 22 years, and life expectancy increased gradually. Meanwhile, the expenditure on health and education rose steadily, where education sector prevailed on health funding.
In 1970 there was 70 death per 1000 birth in terms of infants, while maximum life age was 60. Over the years, people lived longer and by 1992 the age for the oldest person reached 70, whereas the figures for infant mortality dropped to 20 cases.
In 1985, 10% of UAE GDP spent on education, compared to just under 8% on health. Next 8 years, UAE witnessed a dramatic rose in education expenses, reaching about 15% of GDP in 1993 when in 1990 the health sector saw a little reduce at around 5%, even though the numbers doubled at the end of the researched period, spending 10% of GDP on health care.
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 41
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 56
- The graphs below show the Expenditure on Heath Education UAE as percentage of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy 63
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 61
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Health and Education by percentages of GDP between 1985 and 1993. The line grap...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7967032967 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50699420126 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8022886863 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239818935343 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106686133976 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619613800144 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143008722429 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805126876192 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.