The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The bar charts reveal the change in the proportion of five different types of transport which people used to go to their companies and go back home in 1959 and 2009.
Overall, it is evident that the average distance and duration experienced an upward trend. Besides, while foot was the way that was the highest rate in 1959, the percentage of car in 2009 saw higher than other remaining transports.
Look at two charts, the average distance in 2009 was higher nearly 6 times than that since 1959. Similarly, the average duration in 1959 stood at 17 minutes while this figure after 50 years increased significantly to 42 minutes. While the figure for people walked to their office and got back home in 1959 was over a fifth, the same percentage in 1009 just accounted for approximately half of the figure in 1959.
Comparison with two charts, the proportions of other and car increased quite sharply from 5 percent to 12 percent and 10 percent to 35 percent respectively. Exactly 15 percent of train both in 1959 and 2009 were identical, the opposite was true for the percentage of bus in 2009 decreased slightly 2 percent compared with this figure in 1959.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-03 | Đức An | 43 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | view | |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | 74 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | asmita acharya | view | |
| 2020-09-10 | stella1303 | 78 | view |
- The graph shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportion of British students in one university in England who are able to speaking other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purpose in 6 areas of the world 73
- The chart gives information about the percentage of overweight men and women in Australia from 1980 to 2010 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77227722772 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59792999724 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559405940594 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8886042793 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148911025442 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664573011735 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491763523925 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914352155049 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486968661366 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.