The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003.

Essay topics:

The graphs below show information about electronic games in South Korea in 2003.

The three pie charts demonstrate the information regarding the age and gender of players of the electronic games, and the list of the best-selling games in south Korea based on the year 2003.

It can be clearly seen from those charts that most of the players are male, whose aged from 18 to 35, and action is the best-seller electronic games with 42%.

Among six divided best-selling electronic games categories, action accounted for the most, sports games were in the second position with 21% while racing games placed at the third with 17%. With role-play and education sectors, there are 7% of each figure that were sold in 2003, and others category made up only 6% in total.

there is a huge different in the gender distribution. A tremendous percentage of south Korean male (72%) were recorded to play electronic games in 2003 whereas girls only took up 28%. The age of the players was divided into three age groups. Teenagers and young adults were two entities that played electronic games the most with 42% of players from 18 to 35 years old. players who did not reach 18 years old yet constituted 35%, and the rest are players aged over 35.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 73 view
2024-11-12 Giang Tran 84 view
2024-07-14 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-07-14 Zahid6400 67 view
2024-07-11 nobitaa 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...category made up only 6% in total. there is a huge different in the gender distr...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 369, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Players
...42% of players from 18 to 35 years old. players who did not reach 18 years old yet cons...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, so, third, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76732673267 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46872407708 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589108910891 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3461119944 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20079804004 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858616538396 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888110076762 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144466805857 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789962819692 0.0819641961636 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.