The graphs below show the different reasons of two groups of students to choose
Dorrifod University. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
features and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided two pie charts illustrate and compares the data on five different reasons that influenced the two groups (Age 18-24, and Age 25 and over) to choose Dorrifod University.
Overall, it can be seen that close to home is the only reason that led the highest number of students in both groups to choose the Dorrifod University.
Examining the data set for the group aged 18-24 in more detail, it is clear that the majority of the students are selected Dorrifod University as it is close to their home and the course offered, is 36% and 35% respectively. Additionally 14% of total students chose by considering the facilties in campus. Only small minority of students chose Dorrifod University due to the reputation of teaching staff (2%), related to industry (4%) and the opportunity to study abroad as part of course (9%).
Turning to the age group of 25 and over, it is evident that highest percentage of students chose Dorrifod University because of close to home, is 3% more than the 18-24 age group. Another major reason that lured the students is course offered accounting for 24% of total students which is 11% less than the 18-24 age community. But the minority of students (3% and 2%) select Dorrifod University because of the opportunity to study abroad and the facilties on campus.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
- Nowadays education quality is very low Some people think we should encourage our students to evaluate and criticize their teachers Others believe that it will result in a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss the both view and give your 67
- The graph shows the spending on research into renewable energy in four countries between 1975 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Attendance in cinema hall for different age groups 73
- In any field business politics education government those in power should be required to step down after five years 50
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81614349776 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64094724383 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47533632287 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.4982198966 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.25 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232250239658 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117349855691 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442524902467 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161094339427 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136986271135 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.