Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
The statement claims that the major policy decisions should come from the politicians and other government experts because they have better judgment and perspective than the general people. I agree with this statement insofar as politicians and other government experts are more experts in the field of decision and policy-making. They have more deep knowledge than the general people in terms of policy making and they have practical experiecne on it. The government experts and the politicians have huge critical thinking abilities than the general people and they can predict and forstall the future occurrences. Nonetheless, in society everyone has the rights to share their opinion and provide decision. Only politicians or the others government experts policy making can make the decision more biased and corrupted. And it also mitigate the democratic value.
First argument in favor of my position is expertise has the value in decision and policy making. The politician and the other government experts are more expart rather than the general people and they have the proper abilities to take the proper decision. And in any society, everyone's decision like expart and unexpart opinion can make the decision wrong and time-consuming and for that the society can be affected badely. So it is better that the policy and decisions are come from the politician and the other government experts. For example, in amy major decision like to make the highway, there need the government civil engineers and the politician's decision because they know whether is better and worth it. But the general people have not the proper knowledge rather than engineers and politicians.
Another argument is the politicians and the other government exparts has the deep knowledge on the particular field to make the major decision because they have the practical experience on it and they have working on it for a long terms. So obviously their decision and policy making will be less polemic than the unexparts. For instance, government experts and politician has the proper knowledge on the government annual budget. They know where the budget will need more and where less. Their decision will more likely be successfully rather than if the decision will come from the unexpected.
Moreover, The politicians and the other government exparts have the critical thinking abilities than the general people and they can predict the future and also can forestall the danger.
However, in society, there are everyone has the right to provide their decision and everyone's opinion are valuable for decision-making. This will ensure everyone's need and less likely to do biased and predilection. If the major decisions come from the government exparts and the plitician then there are more likely to do the decision biased and one group of people will take the more opportunity than others. And for this there will be create the disparate.
In teh society, everyone has the different perspective and when the decision will be thought from different perspective then teher are more likely the decision and teh policy will be right. And this also increase the democratic value in the society.
In conclusion, in the major decision and the policy making, the politicians and teh other government exparts decision are more valuable and obviously, it is necessary to come the decision from them but it will necessary to keep in mind the general people decisions and need to think from different perspective. Filtering the decision and opinion of general public and use the expertise value of the politician, the decision should come. But for some decisions like the country's security, the military and other's screate decision should mask from the general people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | Ying_CHU4.0 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | sam 27 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 66 | view |
- The graph below shows four methods of dealing with waste in four countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram below show the riverpark area of 20 years ago and the river park area now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that studying literature is important for individual character building while others think it is a waste of time Discuss both point of view and provide your own opinion 84
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 734, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...ovide decision. Only politicians or the others government experts policy making can ma...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 835, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mitigates'?
Suggestion: mitigates
... more biased and corrupted. And it also mitigate the democratic value. First argument ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
.... Filtering the decision and opinion of general public and use the expertise value of the poli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 51.0 14.8657303371 343% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3141.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 601.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22628951747 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95129289623 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68117737237 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.309484193012 0.4932671777 63% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1014.3 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6198415815 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.178571429 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4642857143 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.453631930312 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156827332177 0.0831039109588 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125610926656 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261059557019 0.150359130593 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123001092721 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.