Claim Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public Write a re

Essay topics:

Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.
Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

In the recent political trend, it has been seen some political decisions are not compatible with the overall population's opinions. The above prompt address this issue and suggest that imperative political decision should be taken by politicians and other government experts. I mostly agree with this prompt for two reasons which I will elucidate below, but I do concede that in select a few cases government should consider the general population’s opinions.

To begin, in most cases, government officials are suitable to make major policy decisions for the overall good because more connoisseur officials can assimilate the overall effect of the proposed policy and its long-term effects. For example, people say that the government should not invest money in nuclear power plants, given the disastrous repercussions of power plants like Chernobyl, in 1986 but most of them are oblivious to the efficacy of nuclear energy as a sustainable energy source for the future. Furthermore, a significant portion of society argues against government funding of scientific research since there are very few instances of scientific break but after looking at the long-term effect of scientific research it is apparent that it is not fruitless. If government officials abide by the opinion of most of the people, societal progress will stagnate. Public officials are by no means dilettante since they are selected by people through elections and major policy decisions are taken by the collaborative effort of many adept officials who have the foresight of the efficacy of the policy on overall society in the long run. Thus, government experts are apt to make imperative political decisions.

Furthermore, in many instances, indispensable policy should be made by experts since people often fail to comprehend the salutary effect of a proposed policy due to social stigma. For example, when Raja Rammohan Roy tried to demolish the “sati Pratha” in the 18th century most of the people opposed his decision as that time it was sanctimonious similarly when Iswar Chandra Vidyasagar tried to introduce “The Widow Marriage Act” in 1856 most of the people opposed it. If he abides by the social stigma the women's suffering will not mitigate in our society. In many cases, people are unable to comprehend the effectiveness of a policy due to their parochial understanding of society, whereas, government experts and public officials are more open-minded and understand the significant dilemmas of a society thus they should take salient political decisions rather than public.

On the other hand, in a few cases, policy decisions should rely on peoples’ opinions since they are more suitable for making decisions as they are more experienced about the dilemmas in everyday life as public officials rarely face those problems. For example, students, especially in the US are suffering from a significant amount of student debt after their graduation for a long time, in that case, people should decide for less, even free education policies. For instance, most of the roads in the cities of India are in pretty poor condition because of that lots of people are suffering and the government are not cognizant of that, and instead of improving the roads they are funding money for making waterparks. The above examples illustrate that sometimes government officials are not suitable to make policies regarding day-to-day quandaries as they do not have enough experience in that or they do not encounter those problems regularly. Thus in those cases, people are suitable to make linchpin policy decisions.

To conclude, I argue that leaders should make policy decisions based on their experience for the two reasons outlined above. But I do admit that complete reliance on government experts will can result in disastrous consequences for a society.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-26 Zahid6400 50 view
2023-11-07 Ying_CHU4.0 66 view
2023-10-09 sam 27 66 view
2023-09-16 Jeyodi123 66 view
2023-08-20 mainulislamjoy 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user sam 27 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to make imperative political decisions. Furthermore, in many instances, indispen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in 1856 most of the people opposed it. If he abides by the social stigma the wome...
^^
Line 7, column 950, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not encounter those problems regularly. Thus in those cases, people are suitable to ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in many cases, in most cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3244.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3093289689 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83338248106 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451718494272 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1044.0 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5514506634 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.2 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.55 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253836884778 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868604983747 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618228484047 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153513649138 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184948380176 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to make imperative political decisions. Furthermore, in many instances, indispen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in 1856 most of the people opposed it. If he abides by the social stigma the wome...
^^
Line 7, column 950, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not encounter those problems regularly. Thus in those cases, people are suitable to ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, regarding, similarly, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in many cases, in most cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3244.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 611.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3093289689 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97176167858 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83338248106 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451718494272 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1044.0 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.5514506634 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.2 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.55 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253836884778 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868604983747 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618228484047 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153513649138 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184948380176 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.