The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone-damaging gases from 1980 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line charts illustrate the changes in the size of ozone hole in Antarctic region and the amount of three kinds of gases damaging the ozone layer between 1980 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that there was a significant increase in the size of ozone hole in Antarctica over the period. While freon was declining dramatically, the obvious increase was witnessed in the amount of NO2 and H2O2.
To specify, the size of ozone hole in Antarctica soared from below 50,000 square kilometers in 1980 to approximately 240,000 square kilometers, which was almost five times higher than the original level. In other words, ozone hole was the most extensive size in 2000.
Moreover, the second line chart showed a declining trend in the amount of freon, which was the largest proportion in the first year of the period at about 200,000 and went down to 20,000 as the lowest figure in 2000. In addition, the amount of NO2 grew steadily from almost 200,000 in 1990 to 240,000 in 2000, while that of H2O2 showed a similar pattern from below 20,000 to above 80,000.
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over the Antarctic and the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 56
- The graphs below show the size of ozone hole over Antarctica an the production of three ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The three pie charts show the proportion of four kinds of vehicles used in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, while, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79459459459 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40650445587 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524324324324 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0506033214 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.714285714 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244287952519 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136238076579 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934170496009 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17091556361 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824263364713 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.