The graphs below show the trends in three boys' and girls' names which are currently
popular in the UK.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrating the current popular name trends in UK by their gender, between 1925 to 2000 period. While, first graph focused on boys famous name, second graph is depicting girls name trend.
Overall, from the first graph, it was Daniel, Oliver and, Alexander chosen as the common name and all three names were equally low usage in the beginning of the period and reached comparatively higher usage in the end of the period. This trend was also observed in second graph of girls, namely, Sophia, Isabella and Emily. However, there was some fluctuation in the usage during the years which is clearly detected in male group while female group has increased moderately.
Firstly, parents who named their male children Alexander and Oliver were less than 2 in per thousand in 1925 but these choices were reversed in within 50 years, later on in 2000, Alexander become the most famous name by more than 10 in per thousands. Another known name Daniel, which considered the most famous name from 1925 to beginning of 2000, but at the exact point, has beaten by Oliver.
Comparing to the high fluctuation of boy’s name, there was no trend observed in girls name but there was gradual increase in each three names. Naming their female children Emily, Isabella and, Sophia were less than 2 in per thousand in 1925 and constant increase continued until 1950 until Emily become comparatively higher than other two names in 1975 by almost 4 in per thousand. However, by the 2000, all three names were become equally widespread by 8 to 12 in per thousand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | tamir052222 | 52 | view |
- The graphs below show the trends in three boys and girls names which are currently popular in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 52
- Discussion about online encyclopedia and traditional encyclopedia's advantages and disadvantages 78
- University education should include an internship or some type of work experience. Use specific reason and exchange to support your answer. 70
- Consequences of deforestation is explaned by flow chart Summerize information by selecting and reporting main feature 11
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85338345865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35136777403 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518796992481 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2900489302 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192579360511 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100931119441 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737828689847 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144831131162 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915438246819 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85338345865 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35136777403 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518796992481 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 389.7 283.868780488 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2900489302 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192579360511 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100931119441 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0737828689847 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144831131162 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915438246819 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.