The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001.
write a report to a university lecturer describing the data.
In the years 1971 and 2001 citizens of the United Kingdom utilized their funds in seven different categories of spending, and the pie charts above capture this information for our benefit.
Overall, in 1971 theses residents of the UK purchased computers less than any other item, yet the food was the item that they spent the most on. Now when it comes to 2001, books have taken on the bottom position and cars have replaced food for the top spending choice.
From 1971to 2001, books fell by 5%, but the computer spending jumped from 2% to 12%, a 10% rise. The furniture needle really did not move as we can see a slight fall from 9% to 8%. However, restaurant spending doubled from 1971 to 2001.
Food sales fell by 30% from 1971 to 2001, whereas the car purchases more than doubled from 22% to 43%. As a final point, petrol slightly fell by 2% during this time period.
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
- the charts below show the number and types of books bought by men and women and four different age groups in the uk 76
- Nowadays many people choose to be self-employed, rather than to work for a company or organization.Why might this be the case?What could be the disadvantages of being self-employed? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 717.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50943396226 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16240646975 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685534591195 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3949254239 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.625 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127216071667 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601308380921 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492609259126 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0734622795944 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214859897766 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.