The graphs show the cost of watching movies and change in market share of three different way of watching movie

Essay topics:

The graphs show the cost of watching movies and change in market share of three different way of watching movie.

The provided line graph illustrates the sum of money spent by people for watching movies through three different forms ( cinema hall, DVD and legal download), as well as the percentage distribution of these three forms are given in pie charts.

As it is presented in the line graph that, the cinema tickets were the most expensive way to watch movie in 2005, which after experiencing an exponential inclination peaked at £14 in 2011. Whereas a completely different trend was noticed in the price of DVD. In 2005, the cost of DVD was £8. Although it witnessed a steep fall of £ 2 in next two years, reached its all time high in 2011. Next, legal download was the cheapest mode to watch movies in initial year, yet it became expensive than DVD in 2007. After exhibiting a rise in price it plateaued at £8 in 2011.

According to pie charts, the most preffered way to watch movie was renting a DVD ( above three-fourth), while cinema hold the second place with slightly less than one-third share in market. However, both the formats exhibited a marked fall in 2005. Whereas, watching online dipicted a tremendous rise and from 6% it jumped at just above one-fourth in2011.

Overall, it is explicitly seen that the price of movie tickets ballooned with the passing of time. Along with that, DVD had a complete dominance in market, while watching online was gaining its popularity among people.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-06-15 Navneet bal 89 view
Essays by user Navneet bal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing movies through three different forms cinema hall, DVD and legal download, as ...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...tial inclination peaked at £14 in 2011. Whereas a completely different trend was notic...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Whereas a completely different trend was noticed in the price of DVD. In 2005, th...
^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '£2'.
Suggestion: £2
.... Although it witnessed a steep fall of £ 2 in next two years, reached its all time...
^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t it became expensive than DVD in 2007. After exhibiting a rise in price it plateaued...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...red way to watch movie was renting a DVD above three-fourth, while cinema hold th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, third, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.825 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5567992143 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595833333333 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.300728401 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31511962284 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976606555653 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826211643554 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188086811183 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330165949936 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.