The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The given table illustrates percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
Looking from overall perspective, everyone who has a phone used their phones for making calls in early ages. During three years people had started using other features of phone like searching the internet and recording videos.
As you see, in 2006 everyone made calls on their phones. However recording videos were not available at that time, people could take photos. And 66 percentage of people had used this feature. Also searching the internet had not been available. The least percentage of people had played music on phones and it was 12 percent.
In 2008, after two years features as recording video and searching the internet were available and 9% of people had used phones for recording videos. Percentage of people who used phones for making calls was as same as it was in 2006, it was 100%. In 2006, playing games was 17% and in 2008 it increased more than twice. It was 42% in 2008.
It can be seen that making calls decreased by a very small amount, it was 99% in 2010. In this year, usage of some features had declined. For instance, playing games was 42% in 2008 and it had fallen to 1% for two years. Percentage of mobile phone owners using recording video had grown dramatically. It was 9% in 2018 and in 2010, it was 35%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-14 | ililmaidatuz | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | Shohru_x | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | minhtran224 | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-19 | Forhad Hossain Rabbi | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...using various mobile phone features. Looking from overall perspective, everyo...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the internet and recording videos. As you see, in 2006 everyone made calls ...
^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...06 everyone made calls on their phones. However recording videos were not available at ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...entage of people had used this feature. Also searching the internet had not been ava...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic on phones and it was 12 percent. In 2008, after two years features as rec...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more than twice. It was 42% in 2008. It can be seen that making calls decreas...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73728813559 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37829286084 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6057642082 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.7647058824 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.8823529412 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17647058824 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31260548332 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116216019337 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168169680604 0.0843802449381 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254530482325 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195558115791 0.0819641961636 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.