he charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groupsand the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. • You should write at least 150 words. • You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart describes the main purposes for students of different ages to study and how they received work support from their employers.
Overall, the first chart illustrates, students under 26 to 39 are studying for career success, whereas, over 49 age group studying for interest. On the second chart shows the employers support their age group students in which under 26 are the highest and decreasing as the digits of students age increase.
Regarding the first chart, it is clear that under 26 age group individuals are studying for career purposes with 80%. In other decades students under 26-29 and 30-39 age group are slightly decreasing at 70% and approximately 60%, on the other hand, students studying for interest over 49 are dramatically reached a peak at 70% respectively. Students with 40-49 remained constant.
Regarding the second chart, employers support the age group individuals are under 26 age over 60% and decreasing over time with support under 26-29 with 50%, however, under 30 and over-aged students have limited support towards their employers with slightly under 30% and marginally 40%.
- he charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groupsand the amount of support they received from employers.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. • Yo 73
- Some people think that women are generally more peaceful than men as their characters are naturally more nurturing than aggressive To what extent do you agree with this 72
- "The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego, California and the rest of the world". 50
- More and more businesses, as well as individuals, are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating. 61
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 937.175257732 101% => OK
No of words: 179.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26815642458 4.54256449028 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62854950393 2.54303337028 103% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 127.690721649 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491620111732 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 259.2 290.88556701 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2878028107 44.8134815571 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.714285714 76.5299724578 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 16.8248392259 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 4.34317383033 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226849913786 0.216113520407 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147876260868 0.0766984524023 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113038267065 0.0603063233224 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202134705452 0.12726935374 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125207545435 0.0580467560999 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 8.37731958763 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 7.59969072165 105% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.