Household budget in UK and New Zealand in 1980 and 2008
The pie chart shows the comparison of five categories household budget allocation in UK and New Zealand in the year 1980 and 2008.
In 1980, 29% of New Zealand household budget used for food and drink, while in the same picture UK was spent 23% for their needs. By 2008, New Zealand requirement on food and drink increased slightly by 4%, and UK had fallen significantly to 13%. Whereas, There was spending utility bills in two countries were increased from 27% to 31% in New Zealand and 26% to 28% in the UK.
On the other hand, a slightly decreasing about spending leisure in New Zealand by 1% in 2008. Furthermore the proportion on leisure activities became the highest chart in the UK, the number of the chart was rose significantly from 27% in 1980 to 34% in 2008. Finally, as the lowest budget, the two countries spent the cost for transportation and others with the percentage around 10% and 15% of the total budget prepared.
In conclusion, the percentage about spending money in both countries on food and drink had fallen along years, although the allocation for the utility bills were increased differently. In the same picture, UK spent a higher number of the household budget than New Zealand for leisure activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-03 | Trần Ánh Vy | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-01 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- Consuming junk food too much without any controlling in western is commonly biggest failure of people’s poor diet nowadays. Due to the people in UK habit for eating many convenience food, although they understand well that it is not good and be affected 56
- Household budget in UK and New Zealand in 1980 and 2008 84
- Chain Food Production in US 78
- Development in the Coastal Zone Brightsea 67
- Food production in US 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...year 1980 and 2008. In 1980, 29% of New Zealand household budget used for fo...
^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...g leisure in New Zealand by 1% in 2008. Furthermore the proportion on leisure activities be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% and 15% of the total budget prepared. In conclusion, the percentage about spen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1035.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85915492958 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7069626209 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474178403756 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.4756907146 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.5093718312 0.215688989381 236% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239120763679 0.103423049105 231% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155044900221 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370694460619 0.15604864568 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136337147666 0.0819641961636 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.