The rendered bar graph illustrate the statistics of five countries and their trends of incarceration from 1930 to 1980.The data is calibrated in thousands.
As it shown in graph, the Great Britain depicts the significant rose in their figures. In beginning , under 40,000 of people in custody in Great Britain. Meanwhile , the rate of prisoner's increased considerably . It had accounted for 80,000 people in 1980 . However, about 70,000 individuals in capitivity in Australia in 1930.After that it remain steady for next twenty years and at the end it remain constant at 40,000.
Upon further analysing , there was oscillations seen in the figures of New Zealand. In particular, it had the lowest rate of confinement in 1980 aroud 50,000 of prisoners. Unlike, USA had the maximum number of people under custody at the end of the given period with almost 140,000. Notably, Canada had also the higher rate of imprisonment intially, yet, in the mid it witnessed below the 120,000 prisoner's in their records. Although, it stopped at 90,000 in 1980.
Overall,it is evident that, the Great Britain reported the continues growth. While, other nations shows some fluctuations. Especially USA noticed the highest figure at last in confinement.
- (IELTS WRITING TASK-I):The table below shows the figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.Write a report for a university, lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons ? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ends of incarceration from 1930 to 1980.The data is calibrated in thousands. As...
^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cant rose in their figures. In beginning , under 40,000 of people in custody in Gr...
^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e in custody in Great Britain. Meanwhile , the rate of prisoners increased conside...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rate of prisoners increased considerably . It had accounted for 80,000 people in 1...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... had accounted for 80,000 people in 1980 . However, about 70,000 individuals in ca...
^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...uals in capitivity in Australia in 1930.After that it remain steady for next twenty y...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...for next twenty years and at the end it remain constant at 40,000. Upon further ana...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ant at 40,000. Upon further analysing , there was oscillations seen in the figu...
^^
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...t stopped at 90,000 in 1980. Overall,it is evident that, the Great Britain repo...
^^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... Britain reported the continues growth. While, other nations shows some fluctuations....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28934010152 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90613877577 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639593908629 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3391843913 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4285714286 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0714285714 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07142857143 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13748167567 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437257556181 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376115779768 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0836466948599 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257143799229 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.