The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table represents the amount of money spent on food and clothes by an average UK household in 2010 and 2013, and the pie chart describes specifically the percentage of income spent on food and clothes which spread into 5 different categories.
In general, it can be seen that the total family income fell slightly between 2010 and 2013. Another noticeable is that the percentage spent on fruits and vegetables rose dramatically in 2013.
It is clear that the total amount of household income fell from 29000 pounds to 25000 pounds between 2010 and 2013. While there was a slight increase in the total spending on food and clothes from 14000 pounds to 15000 pounds.
One noticeable feature is that the proportion of money used for fruits and vegetables rose rapidly from 20% in 2010 to 35% in 2013. The percentage of using dairy products showed a similar trend where the consumption rose from 15% to 20% between 2010 and 2013. In contrast, the ratio of using meat and fish fell rapidly from 25% to 15% from 2010 to 2013; also, the amount of household income spent on clothes sharply from 22% to 12%. While there were fluctuations from other features, the percentage of income used for other food and drinks remains unchanged, 18%.
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The diagrams show the cross sections of two tunnels one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese Islands 73
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1028.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80373831776 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4498462967 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471962616822 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3971971087 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276337384442 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121224343924 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726142344581 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185785860281 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657863318744 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.