The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that stricter punishments can reduce the number of heart-breaking accidents on the road as drivers will pay attention more to the penalties if they break a law. While I agree with this opinion. I believe that a rigorous penalty is not the only way to improve road safety.
On the one hand, giving drivers harsh penalties will increase their awareness about safety while using their vehicles. it is believed that traffic accident has the most amount of people that came to the other side of the earth; so, governments should apply a range of non-custodial sentences, such as heavy fines and the confiscation of drivers' driving license. The letter of law should be implemented by authority strictly in order to ban offenders from the roads. This will improve road safety as offenders cannot threaten other citizens with their thoughtless actions.
On the other hand, I am convinced that there are many ways to improve the security in road traffic rather than considering punishing drivers strictly as the only option. Firstly, governments should cooperate with local road traffic administration to install speed cameras for catching some speedy criminals which appear to be a dangerous threat for other people. Secondly, there should be some limitations in the speed rate for some specific areas. For example, the limitation of speed rate in the city center should be around 30 kilometers per hour to 40 kilometers per hour and 60 to 70 kilometers on highway-road.
In conclusion, it is necessary to have a severe punishment for dangerous drivers. However, it is not the only way to reduce the number of accidents on road.
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
- The chart below shows the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out the opinions of full time and part time students about its services 73
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...bout the penalties if they break a law. While i agree with this opinion. I believe th...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...he penalties if they break a law. While i agree with this opinion. I believe that...
^
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... the safety while using their vehicles. it is believed that traffic accident has t...
^^
Line 3, column 20, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...houghtless action. On the other hand, i am convinced that there are many ways t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0036900369 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74421174682 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553505535055 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4168760685 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186915101905 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750964918941 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664455902997 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125792283493 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437720646228 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.