The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that increasing the minimum legal age for driving vehicles is the most effective way to make roads safer. I opine that this approach has some influence in the short-term, but the better solution to decrease traffic accidents is strict punishment.
On the one hand, limiting the legal age for driving cars or motorcycles has some benefits. Most traffic accidents are caused by young drivers who are careless drivers. When the government limits the age at which young people can think more carefully, they are not mature enough to understand the consequences of the decisions they make. Raising the legal age means that they have more time to become familiar with traffic rules.
On the other hand, there are many drawbacks to this approach. First of all, youngsters nowadays still drive motorbikes without a driving licence since they are not old enough. No matter what the rules and consequences are, they don't care about them. It is because the punishments are so mild that this is the reason for this action. Drivers should be checked regularly and more strict rules should be enacted. The police have to inspect everyone who exceeds the speed limit or drives without a helmet. When drivers offend, their driving licences must be revoked and a high fine must be paid. Rather than using private vehicles to get to work, local authorities should encourage citizens to use public transportation. This not only reduces cyclone traffic, but also keeps the environment clean.
To sum up, increasing the minimum legal age for driving vehicles is an excellent way to raise road safety. As I mentioned above, this method can be replaced by other ways to reduce traffic accidents.
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems What are the problems What are the solutions 11
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 61
- The favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 73
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...at the rules and consequences are, they dont care about them. It is because the puni...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01773049645 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53823683788 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6720438639 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.2352941176 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968537454175 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319628833783 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342142458283 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663849510589 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317563202337 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...at the rules and consequences are, they dont care about them. It is because the puni...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01773049645 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53823683788 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602836879433 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6720438639 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.2352941176 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968537454175 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319628833783 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342142458283 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663849510589 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317563202337 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.