Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
There is no doubt that high school graduates lack understanding of money management, which has several consequences. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
On the one hand, one of the reasons that impacts students is a lack of formal education. What I mean is that in school’s circumstances, they only educate learners in some main subjects that are full of theory, resulting in students wasting their money as much as possible. For example, some schools in Vietnam just focus on achievement in marks and certification and ignore teaching students the necessary skills. Moreover, another factor related to this problem is parental influence. As the young when they have a meagre income that is from their parents' support. Therefore, pupils constantly rely on their parents' budget to purchase their interests without thinking. This is because parents do not prioritise teaching their children about the importance of money.
On the other hand, there are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, school systems need to supply more life skills, particularly money management, which is essential when students step out of the real world. Students should learn how to manage their finances. Secondly, in terms of parenting, if they keep comfortably giving money to their kids, it would have a detrimental impact. Thus, teaching them how to use money effectively and showing them the significance of money Also, schools ought to cooperate with parents to open some workshops to find ways to work together. Additionally, it is essential to encourage learners to do some part-time jobs to realise how hard they work to earn money and cherish them.
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 73
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 61
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 487, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to this problem is parental influence. As the young when they have a meagre incom...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i mean, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18360655738 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72977156215 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550819672131 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6274320539 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9411764706 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524539964382 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17028665431 0.084324248473 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165263546469 0.0667982634062 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377804444173 0.151304729494 250% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.176095561229 0.056905535591 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.