Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The use of the government's fund for supporting art and culture has been a controversial topic of debate. Some people consider the budget of the government should or should not support for art and culture activities. Below, I will explain why I strongly believe the fund should be used for that purpose.
On the one hand, this money will help young generations learn more information about their culture activities and art. By reminding them about their culture, they will never forget where they come from. Furthermore, the fund of government also helps our culture activities and art to help open it up for everyone to know, not only us but also international friends. For instance, Pho in Vietnam is well-known around the world, thanks to the government. They spend a lot of money for the citizen to extend and develop that to the whole world. And now, there are Vietnamese pho restaurants all over the world
But contrary to what is said, a lot of people take advantage of the fund of the government to get rich illegally. Their greed always leads to them taking that money for themselves. Additionally, they did not contribute to our culture, but they destroyed it. They use the funds of the government to distort ,let the world become wrong about citizens and as a result the government loses more funds to repair and try to persuade them to understand again what they are getting wrong.
In my opinion, I believe that we the government should use the fund to support the culture activities and art, but they should choose the people they can believe and have someone to watch them.
In conclusion, I believe that government funding should be allocated to activities related to culture and art. Although there are still many obstacles
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- More and more measures to improve the security in large urban areas have been introduced in many countries because of the increased crime Do the benefits of these measures outweigh the drawbacks 84
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The chart below shows information about fuel used in the transport sector in different countries in Europe compared to the EU average in 2009 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'phos'?
Suggestion: phos
...le world. And now, there are Vietnamese pho restaurants all over the world But c...
^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e the funds of the government to distort ,let the world become wrong about citizen...
^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... activities related to culture and art. Although there are still many obstacles
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85953177258 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64938256446 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515050167224 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9405869231 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343913592981 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132888336224 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124729950651 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23640380364 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125930114641 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.