The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013.
The table illustrates the amount of income and expenditure on food and clothes of a household in Britain in 2010 and 2013; whereas the pie charts show how their spending on food and clothes was broken down in 5 categories. Overall, it is clear from the table that the total income decreased in 2013 while the expenditure saw a slight increase. The proportion spent on fruit and vegetables rose sharply over 3 years.
The total income declined significantly by £4000 over the period surveyed, from £29000 to £25000. Despite the declining trend, the amount of money spent on food and clothes experienced a rise of £1000, reaching £15000 in 2013.
Taking the expenditure on food and clothes, the proportion spent on clothes fell by 10%, from 22% to 12%. The number of bucks spent on meat and fish also followed the former to see a 10% decline to 15% in 2013. On the contrary, the percentage of spending on fruit and vegetables and dairy products both increased notably. The former rose gradually from 20% to 35% while the latter just went up to 20% in the end. The figure for other food and drinks remained unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-04 | To Rang | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-29 | Thang Tran | 61 | view |
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 77
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 84
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 934.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76530612245 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58018028034 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4683411496 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187054913678 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665802477424 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705727656793 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130682291163 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057908990077 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.