Internet users in three different countries between 1999 and 2009
The graph gives information about internet users in three different countries along one decade from 1999 to 2009. The were three countries will be figured out specifically in USA, Canada, and Mexico and measured in percentage. Overall, the most positive movement of internet users progression had to be in Canada thoroughly whilst the lowest amount was in Mexico and its trend was increasing slightly.
Regarding to the data, Canada’s internet users was the most sharply increased from 10% in 1999 and incrementally went up to ten times higher at 100% after one decade. Then the next highest progressed was in USA which started at 22% in early decade and climbed up to four times higher in 2009 stood at 85% approximately.
Additionally, the lowest internet users increment happened to be in Mexico. The amount was extensively the smallest which counted from around 5% initially and gradually increased about eight times higher to 40% in 2009 as the end of decade respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-26 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-25 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | lynnnn | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | caychanhvang | 70 | view |
- changes in annual spending by a particular UK in 1981, 1991, and 2001 67
- Preferred leisure activities of Australian children 67
- Information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries 73
- One government’s spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts event in the same years 67
- young people are thrusted to work or travel for a year in their transition time after highschool to collage 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87158112621 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583850931677 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5725446258 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.285714286 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284151024769 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147256731048 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144519367901 0.0843802449381 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191370045803 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112417300768 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.