Jenny is conducting a research project on cell phone use. The chart shows the percentage of students, and parents of students, at Jenny’s school who owned cell phone over a 14 year period. The table provides the cell phone ownership rate nationwide over the same timeframe.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The study conducted by Jenny shows two different data sets for the percentage of people who owned a smartphone. The graph shows the given study conducted at Jenny's school on the students and their parents for each year from 2002 till 2016. The table shows the study conducted on entire nation's populace over the given years of 2002, 2010 and 2016.
From the above graph, it can be inferred that for each year, the percentage of students who owned a cell phone in Jenny's school was always less than the percentage of their parents. Also, the ownership percentage for both the demograph has increase for each subsequent year in the given 14 year duration.
In 2002, the difference in percentage of cell phone ownership for parents and their children was almost 50 percent. This trend is continued till 2012, with the percentage of both demographs increasing steadily. After 2012, there is a dramatic spike in the percentage of students owning a cell phone, with the difference diminishing. By 2016, this difference has diminised to almost 10 percent.
The table also shows an increase in nationwide ownership of smartphone for given years, with 2002 having the lowest ownership percentage and 2016 having the highest ownership one. Both the graph and table has their least and highest recorded data in the years 2002 and 2016 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-02 | JAY9923 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-22 | join2saurav | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | omegaji | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | anirudh8860 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accomodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your pos 75
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 60
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum:"Because the future will be dominated by technology, we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students. If our s 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ents for each year from 2002 till 2016. The table shows the study conducted on enti...
^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ble shows the study conducted on entire nations populace over the given years of 2002, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01339285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56229388793 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9938636919 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.090909091 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345640511289 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141047795078 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952420100889 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208505376183 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640476464801 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ents for each year from 2002 till 2016. The table shows the study conducted on enti...
^^^
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ble shows the study conducted on entire nations populace over the given years of 2002, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01339285714 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56229388793 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9938636919 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.090909091 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.09090909091 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345640511289 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141047795078 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952420100889 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208505376183 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640476464801 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.