The line chart illustrates the proportion of waste output by three companied from 2000 to 2015.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of waste output by three companies from 2000 to 2015.
It can be clearly seen that the trends of both Company A and Company B had decreased over a period of 15 years, whereas the emission of Company C quickly increased and reached a peak of nearly 11 tons in 2015.
Getting back to the details, in the beginning 2000, both companies A and B made the waste in 12 tons and 8 tons respectively, while companies C produced the waste that was the lowest number of waste (4 tons). Over the following 5 years, the waste output of Company B and C rose by around 2 tons. By contrast, the figure of company A slightly fell by approximately 1 ton.
We can see that from 2005 to 2015, company A cut the waste production and hit a low of 8 tons and Company B had dramatically reduced the emission to environment, with the figure standing at 3 tons in 2015. However, the waste output of Company C speedily moved upward and reach their highest level (10 tons).
- The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011 67
- The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means bus car train over a period of 60 years 78
- The graph shows the changes in global food and oil prices between in 2000 to 2011 67
- The line chart demonstrates change in the four types of meat consumption beef pork broilers turkey in US from 1955 to 2012 84
- The line chart illustrates the proportion of waste output by three companied from 2000 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 805.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.375 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64038161553 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9368392468 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475502385453 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.272251555883 0.103423049105 263% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.300414530625 0.0843802449381 356% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.400280345531 0.15604864568 257% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.349316398621 0.0819641961636 426% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.