The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011.
The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011.
Overall, the average global price of both oil and food rose quickly over a period of 11 years and reached a peak of nearly 220 points for food and $130 per barrel for oil price respectively. Furthermore, the trends of both commodities were very similar and have correlation (93,6%).
We can see that, in 2000, the price index of food reach to nearly 85 points and the average oil price (per barrel) with the figure reaching over $20. Over the following four years the price of both food and oil remained stable, before increasing steadily from 2004 to 2007. By 2007, the average oil price had tripled, to nearly $60 per barrel, and food price had risen by around 50 points.
In the following years, there was experienced a dramatically increase both commodities within 1 year (2007-2008), with the number of oil prices reaching a peak of approximately $130 per barrel and the food price index going up 220 points. However, the prices of both categories dropped considerably, in 2009, hit a low of below $40 per barrel in oil price and the food price index was 140 points. The global price of both had fluctuated from 2009 to 2010 before recovering again, to nearly $100 per barrel, while the food price index reached its peak, at almost 240 points.
- The graph shows the changes in global food and oil prices between in 2000 to 2011 67
- The line chart demonstrates change in the four types of meat consumption beef pork broilers turkey in US from 1955 to 2012 84
- The line chart illustrates the proportion of waste output by three companied from 2000 to 2015 73
- The line graph illustrates the priced changes of food and oil all over the world from 2000 to 2011 67
- The line graph compares the indicators of the UK people about the moving everyday by three means bus car train over a period of 60 years 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 47, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... following years, there was experienced a dramatically increase both commodities within 1 year 2007-200...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59414225941 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46385612395 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481171548117 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0277690151 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5555555556 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4093130036 0.215688989381 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23962187967 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.275785328519 0.0843802449381 327% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403402641845 0.15604864568 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.347028742654 0.0819641961636 423% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.