the line chart shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city
The given line graph displays the comparison of statistics of different people’s reasons to move to the capital city, including employment, study, family/friends, and adventure over the period from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, initially, the employment line was the most popular; however closer to the end of the graph it met with the study figure.
To start with, the trend of employment trend that was the highest at the initial point (60000) increased steadily to nearly 85000 in 2005, which was almost 37000 above the study line in the same year. Then, the trend experienced a slow growth to 92000, after which it declined slowly to 87000 in 2015, where it met with the study figure. In comparison to the employment line, the study trend started with 25000, increasing sharply to 48000 in 2005. Then, between 2005 and 2010 it was not quite stable as the employment trend, the figure was increased to 55000, after which it jumped significantly to 87000.
The line of family and friends cause experienced a slight increase from 11000 to 22000 from 2000 to 2010, then it left stable in 2015. The figure of the adventure reason was almost as stable as the line of family/friends; it was increasing steadily for the whole fifteen-years period from 10000 to 15000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
2024-08-26 | khanhkhanhlhp | 84 | view |
2024-07-08 | Vicky_2702 | 67 | view |
2023-02-06 | nghaff | 70 | view |
2022-11-26 | annais | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 11
- the line chart shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city 67
- the line chart shows the results of a survey giving the reasons why people moved to the capital city 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92990654206 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64846110621 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514018691589 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2770097064 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.875 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0953624193101 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491664878201 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539546552287 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0772611752182 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615354176915 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.